Mullins Otte wrote:
This "newspaper" appears to be a sensationalist rag pandering to Christian Zionists, Neo-Cons, and anyone else with an agenda best promoted through inneundo and deceit. It is unworthy to be published on a site striving for the excelency of scholarship that SermonAudio strives to achieve. Sadly, thee are enough closet racists cowering under the guise of "Evangelical Christianity" and "American Patriotism" who will lap it up like a pig at the trough. Like or dislike whom you will, but throwing garbage only makes your own hands stink.

lyn wrote:
Dr. Phil, I appreciate your insight on sexual sin, your statement, 'suppressed fornication resurfaces into pedophilia or homosexuality' is filled with much truth.
And Faithful Remnant's comment concerning mandatory celibacy is also key in all this. There is so much covering up done by the RCC to protect their own, and as a result, they are subjecting innocent children to their perversion, as well as leading their followers down the broad way. It is sad that many are so blind by the teachings of the RCC, they too overlook or excuse the sin that is running wild within. And yes, this sexual perversion is spring boarding out from all denominations, definitely reflecting the sign of the times.

Faithful Remnant wrote:
Thanks Dr. Phil for elaborating further. I personally believe mandatory celibacy is also a factor here. Of course such a doctrine appears to be a doctrine of demons as St. Paul says of such...forbidding to marry, abstaining etc...are doctrines of demons. I know of one Protestant minister who freely chose to remain celibate for the purpose of ministry, but this is still different as he would be free to marry if he wanted. He is not required to remain unmarried. St. Paul teaches that marriage is a God-given way to combat sexual immorality.
And I agree with Lyn about sin and repentance.

Faithful Remnant wrote:
I will admit that even in the evangelical movement have come some rather unholy, fraudulent, child molesting, sexually perverted preachers as well. Evangelical churches are not immune to this problem and it is best to be honest in this discussion. This is not a Catholic-only problem.

John Yurich wrote:
It is totally false that the Pope is the ANTICHRIST. No Pope or anybody else has ever been the one and only ANTICHRIST. There will only be one ANTICHRIST. There are many antichrists. And the Pope is not an antichrist because the antichrist means against Christ. And since when is the Pope against Christ? And I am not serving the Pope because I have dispensed with the unscriptural doctrines and unscriptural parts to the Mass.

You have answered you own question "since when is the Pope against Christ?". Also, since you defend the Pope, have you really dispensed with uscriptural doctrines and unscriptural "parts" of the Mass?

staceyjoe wrote:
In a September, 1992 editorial in The New York Times, Dr. Richard Isay asserts that a “consensus is growing among mental health professionals that homophobia, the irrational fear and hatred of homosexuals, is a psychological abnormality that interferes with the judgment and reliability of those afflicted.” (Isay is chairman of the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual Issues Committee, of the American Psychiatric Association.)
Not long ago, psychiatrists believed homosexuality was a form of mental illness. Now they say homosexuality is normal, while those who oppose it have a mental illness.
Now, as a Christian I do not FEAR nor do I HATE homosexuals (as people), what I do hate though is the act of sodomy.
Woe to those who claim evil is good and good is evil for they shall burn in the lake of fire.

Mike wrote:
Even so, Dr. Phil, unnamed sources in any news item are unreliable by default. For instance the "source close to the Vatican" could be a panhandler sitting outside the property, but "close to the Vatican." I don't think it uncommon for reporters to quote "sources" when trying to manufacture a news story where there may not be one.

Mike wrote:
"Several Italian newspapers cited Vatican sources suggesting that..."
"A source close to the Vatican said that..."
Well I guess if "sources" say something, it must be true.

Jim Lincoln wrote:
PreacherJond, unfair! your hyperlink, has more pictures than mine ([URL=http://www.johnankerberg.org/Articles/roman-catholicism/RC1299W2.htm]]]Is A Catholic Christian An Oxymoron?[/URL]) excellent comments.
G.G., instead of encouraging people of going into the Popish Church you should encourage them to, [URL=http://www.johnankerberg.org/Articles/roman-catholicism/RC0200W2.htm]]]Come out of the Catholic Church.[/URL]

radio45 wrote:
I have always been amused at Protestants. They say, "God said it. I believe it. And that settles it." But on the Body and Blood of Our Savior they say, "Well, God didn't really say it. I can't possibly believe He would. And the whole question is unsettled."
It seems that many would like to redefine the word "is." What definition do you have?

The Lone Wolf wrote:
Notice, He didn't answer any of the questions, but went into the ad hominem attacks on my handle. Did not address the issues.

Nathan wrote:
I find the Law of God commonly taught today as "We're not under law but under grace". What the?
Another mind numbing technique used is the "Law of Love" which means to turn your brain off and just love.
Little do these adulterators of the word of God understand how must effort they put into mangle, wrest, twist and invert the very word of God. A "special" reward awaits them.
It scares me knowing that the very thing Jesus says to those who do magnificent works in His Name is "Go away from me you workers of INIQUITY".
Check out what that means!
And what about the man of lawlessness?
The sheeple are turned away to the statues of men. Like in our Lords time and Noahs time where lawlessness abounded! We are warned that it will be like the days of Noah before the coming of the Son of Man.
Jesus in fact fulfilled the law to the very letter.
Jesus also gave two commandments.
Love the Lord your God which covers the first 5 commandments.
Love your neighbor which covers the last 5 commandments.
Jesus also said "If you love me keep my commandments."
Nothing is more clear.