|
| Page 1 | Page 4 · Found: 183 user comments posted recently. |
|  | |  |
|
|
 12/16/12 4:17 PM |
| TS | |  |  |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
Mike wrote:
I thought you didn't like man's input. So the 54 translators appointed by a man must have been angels then?
Well, maybe 7 of them weren't angels. The KJV has been authorised and approved and used by God for four centuries and equates to the best mss used for the last 2000 years.
It is ludicrous to suggest that God needed to wait for man's archaeology to write and teach the whole truth. Your arminian need for human action is showing again Mike."Man's input" are the heresies he has included in publications - NOT the Holy Spirit guided work of writing God's Holy Word. ------------- Iron Jaw wrote:
I suppose you think that the Dead sea discovery was a hoax??" Nope!! Just entirely unnecessary to communicate and teach the Church the Word of God. The True Word of God was already in existence in the form of the King James Version - AND this by God Himself as HE promised.Can't you trust your god to deliver his word law doctrines precepts???? |
|
|
| 6/15/12 2:23 PM |
| TS | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote:
Well, remember most of the transcripts are the Vatican's, Erasmus was a dedicated Catholic, and this is one reason that the AV By the same token Jim, the NASB is a Roman Catholic bible since your two Anglican Liberal buddies Westcott and Hort, who wrote p/of your Greek text, leaned heavily towards Rome in things like maryolatry and for example
Hort wrote in a letter...July 6, 1848 -- to Mr. John Ellerton -- On Roman Catholicism " . . . almost all Anglican statements are a mixture in various proportions of the true and the Romish view . . . the pure Romish view seems to me nearer, and more likely to lead to, the truth than the Evangelical." (Hort) AND:
October 17, 1865 – to B.F. Westcott -- On Roman Catholicism "I have been persuaded for many years that Mary-worship and ‘Jesus’-worship have very much in common in their causes and results…we condemn all secondary human mediators as injurious to the One, and shut our eyes to the indestructible fact of existing human mediation which is to be found everywhere. But this last error can hardly be expelled till Protestants unlearn the crazy horror of the idea of priesthood." (HORT) This by the guy who helped write your NASB Jim.  |
|
|
| 6/7/12 2:47 PM |
| TS | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote:
there are errors in a Bible Talking about errors Jim.
The Westcott and Hort Greek which your NASB uses in its interpretation was recognised for what it was worth back in the 19th century.Quote:
"Westcott and Hort's Greek Text Was Based on "Ingenious Conjecture."
Dr. Scrivener wrote: "There is little hope for the stability of their [that is, Westcott & Hort's] imposing structure, if its foundations have been laid on the sandy ground of ingenious conjecture. And, since barely the smallest vestige of historical evidence has ever been alleged in support of the views of these accomplished editors, their teaching must either be received as intuitively true, or dismissed from our consideration as precarious and even visionary." [Dr. F. H. A. Scrivener's Plain Introduction, 1883, p. 531, quoted by Dean John W. Burgon, Revision Revised, p. iv]."
[URL=http://www.deanburgonsociety.org/CriticalTexts/dbs2695.htm]]]Westcott and Hort Greek Text and Theory Refuted[/URL] |
|
|
| 5/12/12 3:41 PM |
| TS | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
"The facts in the case are these. The KJ translators used Greek MSS that represent the type of Greek text supported by an overwhelming majority of extant Greek MSS of the New Testament. There are, according to Wilbur N. Pickering, more than 5,000 Greek MSS of the New Testament. Eighty to ninety percent of these MSS are in basic agreement among themselves. The Greek text contained in this majority of MSS is known as the Majority Text, the Byzantine Text, or the Traditional Text (TT). The text of the KJV, which belongs to this majority of MSS, but is not perfectly identical with the TT, is known as the Textus Receptus(TR) - the "Received Text." This text was accepted as the authentic text of the New Testament by the Protestant Church from the Reformation to the nineteenth century and by the Greek Church for more than a thousand years before the Reformation. In the nineteenth century, Westcott and Hort asserted the superiority of a type of text represented by a small minority of Greek MSS, particularly Codex Vaticanus (B) and Codex Sinaiticus (Aleph), which had recently been discovered" (Rev D Englesma) Modern versions NASB/NIV etc, use the Westcott and Hort text. |
|
|
| 5/4/12 4:11 PM |
| TS | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
SOLA AUTOGRAPHA or SOLA APOGRAPHA?
A CASE for the PRESENT PERFECTION and AUTHORITY of the HOLY SCRIPTURES
[URL=http://www.deanburgonsociety.org/Preservation/sola.htm]]]Dr. Jeffrey Khoo[/URL] "... But I believe that the Bible is the Word of GOD-and I believe that GOD's Word must be absolutely infallible. I shall therefore believe the Bible to be absolutely infallible,-until I am convinced to the contrary." "No, Sirs! The Bible (be persuaded) is the very utterance of the Eternal;-as much GOD's Word, as if high Heaven were open, and we heard GOD speaking to us with human voice ... [T]he Bible, from the Alpha to the Omega of it, is filled to overflowing with the Holy Spirit of GOD: the Books of it, and the sentences of it, and the words of it, and the syllables of it,-aye, and the very letters of it." Amen and Amen!" (Dean Burgon) Dean Burgon defends the King James Version of the Word of God! Dr. Khoo also preaches here on SA
[URL=http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=8171116454410]]]KJB Authentic source Texts[/URL] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Even YOU recognise the heretical influences to be found in the NIV organisation.
