|
|
USER COMMENTS BY PEW VIEW |
|
|
Page 1 | Page 8 · Found: 244 user comments posted recently. |
| | | |
|
|
2/5/09 12:35 PM |
pew view | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
DJC49 wrote: Is *Mercy* one of the divine attributes of God? Caveat: Don't be so quick with your answer. Seems like a pretty popular idea all through Scripture DJC49. Unless you are coming from another angle here?Ex 33:19 And he said, I will make all my goodness pass before thee, and I will proclaim the name of the LORD before thee; and will be gracious to whom I will be gracious, and will SHEW MERCY on whom I WILL shew MERCY. Luke 1:58 And her neighbours and her cousins heard how the LORD had shewed great MERCY upon her; and they rejoiced with her. Ps 103:17 But the mercy of the LORD is from everlasting to everlasting upon them that fear him, and his righteousness unto children's children; Titus 1:4 To Titus, mine own son after the common faith: Grace, MERCY and peace, FROM God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ our Saviour. 1Peter 1:3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, which according to HIS ABUNDANT MERCY hath begotten us again unto a lively hope by the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, |
|
|
2/4/09 5:06 PM |
pew view | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
John UK wrote: Okay fill me in with what you think about the state of these Israelites: were they God's people? Redeemed? Purchased by Christ? Regenerated? All filled with the Spirit? All in heaven now? Or did old testament saints have to make decisions without the Spirit? Well as Paul records Romans 9:6 ".....For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel" So not everybody back then got onto the winning team. Only those elected by God. Then he said Romans 9:11 "....that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth) So nobody had to pick the right lottery number. Just like today they were elected by God to salvation, or paid for their sins the hard way. As for making decisions back in the OT era? Nuh! I don't think their were any Arminians trying that method back then. |
|
|
2/4/09 11:05 AM |
pew view | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
John UK wrote: One from the old and one from the new Two examples that I think Why look its ye olde Arminius Nerdlewarbling again.A verse from the OT where Joshua speaks of Covenant renewal to the Israelites - "IS" the same as free willicker decision process?? I don't think so. Flogging a dead carrot 'ere John. Trying to re-establish the age old heresy of faith as a pre-conversion human faculty of intellectual assent by the sinner to cooperate with God unto salvation. This of course is the age old RC Arminian DIY save thyself. Even the heretic Wesley tried to stick in a wee bit of grace to make this work out. As for King Agrippa - Get a grippa here John? The old Arminians at least brought more accurate verses that at least tried to stay in context. eg Luk 17:25. Try that one John. Pharisee/RCC/Arminian/F.Willer always try to insert man into the process to the exclusion of God. The idea that the sinner in his natural estate sat down and pondered the Scripture doctrines with a view to stimulate the brain cells into accept/reject salvation in Christ - whilst overcoming the domain of sin is sheer fiction and fallacy. The simble Biblical fact that GOD ELECTS by Grace and teaches by Spirit negates this heresy. |
|
|
1/21/09 4:34 PM |
pew view | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Watchman wrote: I was not speaking of the writers of the Confessions - only those who use them as their basis for understanding Scripture. To make such a sweeping statement illustrates a very callous and unChristian background to your writing. |
|
|
1/21/09 2:25 PM |
pew view | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Thumbs up wrote: Did Pewview apologise to John UK? What for? We've been here before with John UK. We will probably be back round the Banbury Cross again in a couple of weeks. He appears to have a "thing" with the term Calvinist. Strange thing about it is that even as a Calvinist the only time I use it of myself, is when referring to my doctrine, (in that kind of debate) which of course is the Biblical Doctrines of Grace. First and foremost I am a Christian.This whole discussion commenced with John delivering the heresy that Justification needs to be supported by human works. The TRUTH of course is "Those whom God effectually calleth he also freely justifieth; not by infusing righteousness into them, but by pardoning their sins, and by accounting and accepting their persons as righteous: not for anything wrought in them, or done by them, but for Christ's sake alone; nor by imputing faith itself, the act of believing, or any other evangelical obedience to them, as their righteousness; but by imputing the obedience and satisfaction of Christ unto them, they receiving and resting on him and his righteousness by faith; which faith they have not of themselves, it is the gift of God."WCF |
|
|
1/20/09 4:51 PM |
pew view | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
John UK wrote: Many English Baptists (Strict Baptist) prefer the term 'Particular Redemption' because the expression 'Limited Atonement' is misleading, unbiblical and dishonouring to our Lord Jesus Christ. Spurgeon was one such. Spurgeon did not say this!First today we have John UK teaching that Christ is insufficient and justification by necessary works has replaced the Crucified Christ! Now we see the disinformation of the Papist/Arminian free willer being introduced into Biblical doctrine, by the suggestion that GOD cannot apply His Son's Atonement - only to those whom HE chose/elected before the foundation of the world. But both these heresies (see Canons of Dordt) tie in together. If John can manage to reject the teaching of the application of GOD's choice alone, - to His Son's Atonement; - THEN you are required to introduce further "means" of salvation eg: works to justify the sinner before God??? In this cunning disinformation John UK is like John Yurich trying to bring some credibility to the RCC, whilst claiming to be born again. John UK ".....give diligence to make your calling and election sure...." |
|
|
1/20/09 2:31 PM |
pew view | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
John UK wrote: 1] Also, because justification is ALWAYS accompanied by GOOD WORKS, the Bible can say that justification is by works also. 2] like the flower people who claim L because the TU.IP doctrines logically demand it. 1] "Justification by WORKS"????????????? 2] No wonder John can't see the truth of Limited Atonement. He wants human works to justify the sinner before God! Q70: What is justification? A70: Justification is an *ACT of GOD's FREE GRACE* unto sinners,[1] in which he pardoneth all their sins, accepteth and accounteth their persons righteous in his sight;[2] *NOT* for any thing wrought in them, OR DONE BY THEM,[3] but only for the perfect obedience and full satisfaction of CHRIST, by God IMPUTED to them,[4] and received by faith alone.[5] 1] Rom 3:22, 24-25; 4;5 2] II Cor 5:19, 21; Rom 3:22-25, 27-28 3] Titus 3:5, 7; Eph 1:7 4] Rom 4:6-8; 5:17-19 5] Acts 10:43; Gal 2:16; Phil 3:9 Human effort does NOT justify sinners before GOD! ONLY Jesus Christ does that. |
|
|
1/19/09 3:32 PM |
pew view | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
"UK scientists have been given the go-ahead to inject cells made from an aborted baby into patients’ brains in trials that were refused permission by regulators overseas"OR "UK benefits from the legalised murder of a child" United Kingdom of Sodom and Gomorah strikes again. Matt 11:24 But I say unto you, That it shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom in the day of judgment, than for thee. Luke 17:29 But the same day that Lot went out of Sodom it rained fire and brimstone from heaven, and destroyed them all. When the True Church leaves this island - then brimstone...... 2Pet 2:6 And turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrha into ashes condemned them with an overthrow, making them an ensample unto those that after should live ungodly; |
|
|
1/17/09 4:35 PM |
pew view | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Wonder how many of these so called "Protestants" follow these tenets.The fundamental principles of sixteenth century Protestantism included the following: # Soli deo Gloria the justification of God's wisdom and power against papal usurpation and manmade religion, honoring God's sovereign transcendence and providential predestination. # Sola Gratia redemption as God's free gift accomplished by Christ's saving death and resurrection # Sola Scriptura the freedom of Scripture to rule as God's word in the church, disentangled from papal and ecclesiastical magisterium and tradition # The Church as the Believing People of God constituted not by hierarchy, succession, or institution, but God's election and calling in Christ through the gospel # The Priesthood of All Believers the privileged freedom of all the baptized to stand before God in Christ "without patented human intermediaries" and their calling to be bearers of judgment and grace as "little Christs" to their neighbors. # The Sanctity of All Callings or Vocations the rejection of medieval distinctions between secular and sacred or "religious" (i.e., monastic) with the depreciation of the former, and the recognition of all ways of life as divine vocations" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|