|
|
USER COMMENTS BY DJC49 |
|
|
Page 1 | Page 7 · Found: 500 user comments posted recently. |
| | | |
|
|
1/3/14 1:15 PM |
DJC49 | | Florida | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
GsTexas wrote: Are these debates really Biblical? I'm all for contending for the faith, but shouldn't he be spreading the Gospel instead of trying to convince him of God's existence, or creation science? I like Ken Ham a lot, I'm sure he will present good arguments, but I've never seen a debate where the evolutionist concedes he is wrong. I remember Kent Hovind would give a Gospel message at the end of his debates, I hope Ken Ham does the same. Your point is understandable and well-taken. However, The Gospel is absolutely meaningless and unnecessary to one who does not first accept the existence of God ... and just not any "god," but the God of Scripture. It's as if one were trying to convince someone of the "good news" that 2+2=4 when that someone didn't believe in the existence of "2" or "4" First is the elementary belief in (a) God; second, the belief in the God of the Bible; third, that there is BAD news for all; fourth, that there is GOOD news for all who believe God's Gospel! |
|
|
12/26/13 11:42 AM |
DJC49 | | Florida | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote: Yes, universal healthcare is what expected from civilized societies. Really? Don't you mean from modern, secular, SOCIALIST societies? |
|
|
12/23/13 11:55 AM |
DJC49 | | Florida | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
John Yurich USA wrote: I agree that per Catholic teaching a Catholic must attend Mass and partake of the Sacraments in order to go to Heaven upon ones demise. But I don't practice the Catholic way of salvation since I don't believe the Mass is a sacrifice and I don't believe the Sacraments have anything to do with salvation. If you don't believe in their fundamental doctrines, then what are you doing in their church? |
|
|
12/18/13 11:36 AM |
DJC49 | | Florida | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
John Yurich USA wrote: But church attendance/membership is superfluous to entering Heaven. So why would the Holy Spirit guide someone who is Born Again out of the RCC? When everybody stands before Jesus after passing away He will not look at the church that one attended in determining who will enter Heaven. He will only look at if one had trusted in Him alone for salvation. Sorry, John, but RCC doctrine is once again AGAINST your personal beliefs!According to RCC doctrine, if a Roman Catholic does not attend mass each and every Sunday - and Holy Days of Obligation - he commits a MORTAL sin! This sin, in effect, puts him OUT of a state of grace and thereby his "salvation" is LOST (if not confessed in the "sacrament" of Confession directly to a RC priest). Lost your salvation lately, John? By the way, John, if church attendance is not necessary, why don't you just go to a Muslim mosque all the while maintaining your present beliefs? The result would be just about the same as what you are presently doing. I suppose you just like stained glass windows portraying the various saints. |
|
|
12/6/13 11:26 AM |
DJC49 | | Florida | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
John Yurich USA wrote: What is your problem anyway? Luther retained the Mass in the Lutheran Church minus the unscriptural parts of stating that the Mass is a sacrifice, etc. All the Protestant Reformers celebrated the Birth of Jesus because they knew that because if the wise men celebrated the Birth of Jesus that it is not unscriptural to celebrate the Birth of Jesus. And all normal Born Again individuals celebrate the Birth of Jesus because they also know that if the wise men celebrated the Birth of Jesus that it is not unscriptural to celebrate the Birth of Jesus. What blather! |
|
|
11/22/13 9:01 AM |
DJC49 | | Florida | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote: I would suppose that Mzzzzzzzzzzz Steinem got her reward for he work in "women's rights," and as far as she and many are concerned "pro-choice" is just incidental to women's rights. Wrong. At the very core abortion is the essential ingredient to "women's rights." It is NOT "incidental." But you'll defend YOUR political Pope no matter what, Mr. Lincoln! |
|
|
11/13/13 11:58 AM |
DJC49 | | Florida | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
John Yurich USA wrote: I am not pretending to be Catholic. I am Catholic as I was Baptized Catholic and I attend the Catholic Church. If I don't say amen when I am handed the bread and wine then I am not acknowledging the Catholic doctrine of Holy Communion. And if I refrain from stating "and I ask the blessed Mary ever virgin and all the angels and Saints" and "may the Lord accept this sacrifice" then I am not acknowledging those doctrines. And if I don'T pay attention during the Eucharistic Prayer when the intercession of the Virgin Mary and the Saints is mentioned then I am not acknowledging that doctrine. You, John, are a smorgasbord Catholic. I.e., picking and chosing whatever Roman Catholic doctrine you chose to believe. Even the ESSENTIAL doctrines which DEFINES one as being a Roman Catholic! |
|
|
11/5/13 10:42 AM |
DJC49 | | Florida | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
John Yurich USA wrote: No of course I don't respond with "Amen" when I am handed the bread and the cup of wine by the Eucharistic Minister for the reason that it would be acknowledging the Catholic doctrine that the bread and wine are the very body and blood of Jesus. I rarely receive the bread and the cup of wine from the priest. When I receive the bread and the cup of wine in the Catholic Church I pretend that it is the way that the Lutheran Church teaches about Holy Communion. John, if you do NOT believe what one MUST believe (ESSENTIAL doctrines] to remain a Roman Catholic, then why do you persist on attending that "church?" |
|
|
10/2/13 12:57 PM |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
John UK wrote: It would be great if you would put as much effort into revealing the severe corruptions of some modern versions as you do in showing a blemish in the KJV. p.s. Good to see you posting again. There's a "blemish" in the KJV? God forbid! |
|
|
10/2/13 11:23 AM |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
SF from TX wrote: You can't read the wrong "Bible" rightly. It's wrong. Things that contradict can not both be right. Example: Isaiah 14:12,15. Look that up in the KJV and the NIV/NASB. Then look up Revelation 16:22 to see who the real morning star is. Clearly the KJV is of God and the Vatican manuscripts-new versions) are satanic. No surprise though-satan transforms himself into a angel of light, 2 Corinthians 11:14. Now read: Acts 12:4 in the KJV. It translates "pascha" as EASTER! Clearly, the original manuscripts were refering to PASSOVER ... not Easter (which had its origins in paganism). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|