|
|
USER COMMENTS BY “ R. K. BORILL ” |
|
|
| Page 1 | Page 21 · Found: 500 user comments posted recently. |
|  | |  |
|
|
 3/14/14 7:58 AM |
| R. K. Borill | | Baton Rouge, Louisiana | |  |  |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
Biblical Presbyterian,
Lurker has never been able to grasp the unilateral nature of the Abrahamic Covenant as per Genesis 15. Nor does he perceive the special relationship which the Covenant has with God's elect.
As per usual it is all a matter of correct exegesis which seems to be lost to the Baptist.I agree. I suppose that is why they read into our words what they want them to say in order to attack their straw man and receive some gratification. The first covenant made with man was a covenant of works, wherein life was promised to Adam; and in him to his posterity, upon condition of perfect and personal obedience. Man, by his fall, having made himself incapable of life by that covenant, the Lord was pleased to make a second,[5] commonly called the covenant of grace; wherein He freely offers unto sinners life and salvation by Jesus Christ; requiring of them faith in Him, that they may be saved, and promising to give unto all those that are ordained unto eternal life His Holy Spirit, to make them willing, and able to believe. Galatians 3:29 KJV
[29] And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise. |
|
|
| 3/14/14 5:56 AM |
| R. K. Borill | | Baton Rouge, Louisiana | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
John UK writes:
To obey God in the NT, "Repent and be baptised" for he that "believeth and is baptised shall be saved."Here we have the simple order of things for the new covenant. A sinner MUST repent, he MUST believe, and then he is a candidate for baptism. Before baptism, the elders MUST see the grace of God in that man's life before they baptise him. Check out the eunuch's conversion in Acts 8. R. K. Borill responds, Old and New Testaments both, salvation has always been justification by faith alone. No one has ever been saved by the works of the law. Galatians 3:6-7 KJV
[6] Even as Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness. [7] Know ye therefore that they which are of faith, the same are the children of Abraham. |
|
|
| 3/13/14 8:38 PM |
| R. K. Borill | | Baton Rouge, Louisiana | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
Observer writes:
Simple, but a very profound point that Borill will never understand because he's been taught to think like a Jew. In this respect he's a Judaizer!R. K, Borill responds,
Man, you crack me up. ??
Well at least you give me some credit for thinking which is more than I can say for Dispy Dippers. Like your mentor Al Gore said, what part of "locked box" don't you understand. I ask what part of everlasting don't you understand? What part of will not dis annul don't you understand? What part of sovereign don't you understand? Galatians 3:16-17 KJV
[16] Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ. [17] And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect. |
|
|
| 3/13/14 8:02 PM |
| R. K. Borill | | Baton Rouge, Louisiana | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
Observer writes:
If RK believes this then he MUST think that all the seed will indeed come to believe. SO, WHAT if this is NOT the case? Which it clearly is not most of the time. Did GOD LIE? Don't they make God a liar?R. K. Borill responds: Shucks. Just when I thought he had it. I suppose God was lying when he told Abraham to circumcise his sons when all the while he loved Jacob and hated his grandson Esau. Is there unrighteousness with God? God forbid. Romans 9:13-15 KJV
[13] As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated. [14] What shall we say then? Is there unrighteousness with God? God forbid. [15] For he saith to Moses, I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion. Isn't interesting how Paul by the spirit of God uses the Abrahamic covenant to illustrate sovereign grace. |
|
|
| 3/13/14 7:21 PM |
| R. K. Borill | | Baton Rouge, Louisiana | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
John UK writes:
Aree the children of believers elect? No-one knows. They might be, they might not be. Does the Presby church baptise the children of the devil and give them membership? Yes, they sometimes do. Is God pleased with that? No, he is not pleased.R. K. Borill response: Esau was circumcised (the sign of the Abrahamic covenant) . Esau was not elect, therefore, God was displeased with Issac's obedience. Typical Dispy Dipper irrationalism. What's the moral here, find a Dispy Dipper church. They know who the elect are. How do they know? Why all you have to do is say so, and your in like flint. Now when you get to heaven, there will not be lot of OT people. Their covenant was not an everlasting covenant; Conelius will be there, but David we're not too sure about. |
|
|
| 3/13/14 7:20 PM |
| R. K. Borill | | Baton Rouge, Louisiana | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
Are the children of believers elect? No-one knows. They might be, they might not be. Does the Presby church baptise the children of the devil and give them membership? Yes, they sometimes do. Is God pleased with that? No, he is not pleased.R. K. Borill response: Esau was circumcised (the sign of the Abrahamic covenant) . Esau was not elect, therefore, God was displeased with Issac's obedience. Typical Dispy Dipper irrationalism. What's the moral here, find a Dispy Dipper church. They know who the elect are. How do they know? Why all you have to do is say so, and your in like flint. Now when you get to heaven, there will not be lot of OT people. Their covenant was not an everlasting covenant; Conelius will be there, but David we're not too sure about. |
|
|
| 3/13/14 11:47 AM |
| R. K. Borill | | Baton Rouge, Louisiana | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
Dispy Dipsies writes:If you want an explanation of Gal. 3:6-9, and 17 and how this totally demolishes infant baptism, I am very happy to explain it to you. Problem is because you don't like Bible, you won't like the explanation! I will tell you though that Dispys do not teach error that is fatal to the soul, and they are serious bible students, who do know their bibles, unlike the majority of ignorant Presbys! R. K. Borill responds, Is this response from the Scoffield Scoffers manual? |
|
|
| 3/13/14 8:42 AM |
| R. K. Borill | | Baton Rouge, Louisiana | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
Observer writes:Well lookie here. We have RK's true colors coming to the fore now. Having already explained to him that I am not a Dispy, he wants to continue to call me a Dispy! Wonder why the LIE? And then to top it all, the usual, torture Scripture to accuse us Baptists of not being saved and being workers of iniquity! May the Lord rebuke you! R. K. Borill responds: Because of their inability to force Gal. 3:6-9, and 17 into their heresies, the Dispy Dipsies resort to their scoffing. They should become more familiar with their scoffers manual, the Scoffers Scofield bible. Although they deny their association with their Dispy leader, they are closer to him than they realize. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
