Good point Bill, but what do you think will be the result if the Jesuites who are using this forum to train their spies in fallacy go without response. What will result if we do not answer a fool?

As opposed to what. . . The Antichrist of the RCC?

All dogs have 4 legs. Cats have 4 legs. Therefore, all cats are dogs. Much like the barking cats here.

I suggest you consult a dictionary for the proper definition of "medium" and "mediator" while you are at it.

Sure. I take no offense to your view, and I am certain there are Presbyterians who misinterpret the WCF just as there are Jesuite subversives in every denomination. These spies are Vatican trained to subvert whole Protestant churches and denominations especially.

Says the one who hides behind an alias.

Romans 14:12 KJV
[12] So then every one of us shall give account of himself to God.

Actually Mike if you notice we don't bring it up unless we are asked to defend it. I think people enjoy seeing if we can.

I know what you mean, I have a "studio" iPhone too.

John, these are very important qualifying words that are often overlooked by those who oppose infant baptism.
Presbyterians see ourselves just as infants when God deals with any of us: without understanding and helpless totally dependent upon Him for life or we die.

This may sound like I'm dodging the question but I'm not. What advantage is it that the Baptists baptize all professors if they know before hand that not all professors have a genuine repentance and faith. What justifications I they have without absolute certainty? Their justification is the command of God. Presbyterians likewise just like Abraham who circumcised Ishmael because it was the command of God desired his salvation, but God later reveal to him "in Issac shall thy seed be called". Is is regeneration that makes any baptism effective whether it is Baptist or Presbyterian!!

That's right. They which are the children of the flesh, these are NOT the children of GOD, but the children of THE PROMISE are counted FOR THE SEED. I say then is Abraham given who are the elect of God like the Bsptists. No, but he was a faithful servant to place the sign of the covenant on all his children knowing that God would be faithful to call His own unto himself.

Apparently, these experts on Calvin have read everything he's written and speak with absolute understanding of his writings. . . So they think.

Romans 9:6-8 KJV
[6] Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel: [7] Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called. [8] That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed.

John 1:12-13 KJV
[12] But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: [13] Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.

Jude 1:10 KJV
[10] But these speak evil of those things which they know not: but what they know naturally, as brute beasts, in those things they corrupt themselves.