|
|
USER COMMENTS BY SAVED BY GRACE |
|
|
Page 1 | Page 13 · Found: 500 user comments posted recently. |
| | | |
|
|
6/8/09 12:57 AM |
savedbygrace | | Harrisburg, PA | | | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
The Honorable Judge Zatkoff, stated:"Pursuant to the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act the government has injected AIG with tens of billions of dollars, without restricting or tracking how this considerable sum of money is spent." Will this finding about Sharia elicit? That our President was Muslim complicit? White House and Congress establish funds Covertly arm our enemy with guns? Treason - a trial may decide. Congressional hearings put aside? AIG given so much money. Had to be a government chummy. |
|
|
6/4/09 3:53 AM |
savedbygrace | | Harrisburg, PA | | | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Aydrian, Gross immorality will always be outlawed in any society that wishes to be guided by Biblical principles. Your all-permissive equality would of course include lawlessness. As Mark Levin, in his book, "Men In Black", states, until Justice Hugo Black revived it in 1947, separation of church and state was an obscure metaphor. This had nothing to do with the first amendment and incidentally Jefferson was not even around at the time as he was over in Europe. Quoting Mark Levin, "Men In Black": "Interestingly, two days after writing to the Danbury Baptists, Jefferson attended church services held in the House of Representatives and continued as a regular attendant throughout his presidency." JOHN 3:36 |
|
|
5/28/09 9:55 PM |
savedbygrace | | Harrisburg, PA | | | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
False church cover-up. True Christian wouldn't sup.'Trust your priest', drugging. Perversion swept under rugging. Difference: N.Y.C. mugging. And r.c.c. hugging. Every man and boy. They will both destroy. Too wicked to mention. Acts of Rome's henchmen. JOHN 3:36 |
|
|
5/10/09 10:30 PM |
savedbygrace | | Harrisburg, PA | | | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
If relating both wheat and spelt as being two grains and also emphasizing the word "is", then Mike/N.Y., might have a legitimate point. So, if wheat is spelt wrong, then wheat is not spelt(considering the negation of spelt and of course ignoring all proper punctuation) and only spelt is spelt after all. That is of course unless spelt is spelled according to the proper class in a particular age and assuming that the speller was not then under a spell and even then all would not be well. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|