|
|
USER COMMENTS BY MIKE |
|
|
Page 1 | Page 10 · Found: 500 user comments posted recently. |
| | | |
|
|
12/4/2020 10:15 AM |
Mike | | New York | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote: Well, Mike, the way he's handled the corona virus situation, and Environmental issues, just one of two —- That’s hardly specific, Jim. What did Trump actually do (or not do, in case you shuffle off in that direction) regarding the virus that you disagree with? What did he do in the world of the environment that you disagree with? Surely you have formulated some of your own thoughts on these things. And to quote Ben Shapiro, facts don’t care about your feelings. |
|
|
12/4/2020 10:03 AM |
Mike | | New York | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote: Samuel Bess and Gang Zhou, had what I think some of the best comments to the article on the article page. Just how are you going to straighten out the sins of the fathers? Of course some whiners say to pray for this and that, which absolves them of any action. it is good that a lot of people are thinking about this problem in Minnesota anyway. Lily white churches as well as complete black ones have a certain blindness to racism. They often forget, Galatians 3:26-28 26. For you are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus. 27. For all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. 28. There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free man, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus. -- https://tinyurl.com/has82mk (NASB) But Jim, It’s obvious you don’t believe those verses. Evidence? You continually define things by color. As in “lily white churches” and “complete black ones.” It seems to fly over your head that when you do this, when you see the church’s role as needing color adjustment in order to prove its righteousness in Christ, that you are blind to your very own personal racism. |
|
|
12/3/2020 7:50 PM |
Mike | | New York | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote: —- Now a few psychiatrists have come to the same conclusion as this one has. It would be kinder of me to agree with him, because in some ways this would make Trump less responsible for his actions. —- Aside from what psycobabblers say, could you be more specific? Which of his policies do you disagree with? |
|
|
12/3/2020 6:04 PM |
Mike | | New York | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Neil wrote: Summa Theologica, Secunda Secundæ Partis, Q 66, Art. 7: "...if the need be so manifest and urgent, that it is evident that the present need must be remedied by whatever means be at hand..., then it is lawful for a man to succor his own need by means of another's property, by taking it either openly or secretly: nor is this properly speaking theft or robbery." With 13th-Century casuistry like this, little wonder the pope can so readily endorse universal income. Besides, clerical benefices are almost the same thing. I wonder if there’s a exception clause in there forbidding robbery of the Vatican? |
|
|
12/3/2020 11:31 AM |
Mike | | New York | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote: Luther on plagues: "Martin Luther’s pandemic advice goes viral — 500 years later" https://tinyurl.com/y3ohjdft Actually I doubt a few of the peddlers of the Word in California are going to follow Luther's example. Probably many of them are worried about raking in the money. excerpt from, "Supreme Court grants California church's challenge to coronavirus restrictions" https://tinyurl.com/y2sswcjv Two questions. 1. Do you also follow Luther’s position and believe in Purgatory? 2. Why are you opposed to the Supreme Court ruling according to the obvious meaning of the first Amendment? |
|
|
12/2/2020 6:08 PM |
Mike | | New York | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote: excerpt from, "Trump’s post-presidency will be cluttered with potentially serious legal battles" https://tinyurl.com/yxoqf4xj Kieron, I gave you reasons why it's unhappy with him but they all seem to got erased. Needless to say, it's getting to be about 7 million people extra over the majority we're not happy with him. But as you see even Joe Biden has other things to do than to worry about Trump. I will be glad when January 20th comes along, and then New York State can start worrying about him. Dead people and made up people and computer changed voter people don’t count, if honor meant anything. But you go ahead and celebrate corruption, Jim. You’re getting good at it. |
|
|
12/2/2020 8:22 AM |
Mike | | New York | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Lurker wrote: Ha! Barr's exact words: "the U.S. Justice Department has uncovered no evidence of widespread voter fraud that could change the outcome of the 2020 election." Any idea why he said that, Jim? Because the constitution makes the fraud allegations a matter for the courts. He hasn't seen or uncovered any evidence because it's not being presented to him nor is the DOJ investigating it. But you prefer the spin of the liberal media. On top of that, it wouldn’t take widespread voter fraud anyway, but concentrated fraud in select areas, such as swing States. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|